Research Dossier ID-06 · Candidate · Developer Preview Q4 2026
The AORUS idea continued: not removing the cable, but removing the accelerator's marriage to one computer. The app stays on your laptop, the GPU-work happens in the box, results come home over Wi-Fi. The marketing says one seamless thing. The documentation says three. This dossier keeps them separate.
Three modes, three levels of proof. The index refuses to merge them into one “supports everything”. Hover to see what each promise actually commits to.
Plate W1 — box, brains, and the gap between shows and shipments
| In the brochure | What it actually says | |
|---|---|---|
| “GPU OVER WI-FI” | → | The slogan hides the load-bearing wall: what stays by the GPU, what crosses the wire, and how the software hides the split from the app. That software layer is the product. The radio is just the radio. |
| OWN CPU · STORAGE · OS | → | Physically a standalone compute node — not a graphics card with a Wi-Fi module bolted on. Novelty lives in how capabilities are presented to applications, not in the box existing. |
| ONE BOX, MANY DEVICES | → | Different devices sharing one accelerator is the declared capability. Claimed, not confirmed — no independent multi-client evidence yet. The Steam-Headless family route you already run is a working alternative, not a worse one. |
| $2,599 / $9,999 | → | RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB or RTX 5090 32 GB. At the top price, the software must prove value beyond the silicon — you're not buying a GPU, you're buying the integration tax back. |
| “SHIPS IN 8 WEEKS” | → | A promised window, not a witnessed delivery. Same filing rule as every dossier: promises go in pencil. NYC shows Oct 5–6 are a chance to see claims outside one promo video — still not independent results. |
| DEV PREVIEW · Q4 2026 | → | Examples and interfaces on the technical pages are marked preliminary. The honest reading: architecture described, product unproven. That's not an insult — it's the correct epistemic shelf. |
Plate M2 — memory as territory: what stays, what crosses, what returns
The technical articles are better than the slogan. Where LUCEBOX distributed compute between two pools in one box, WiCi distributes it across a wire — and the research variable is new: the device boundary, and how rarely it truly needs crossing.
Active data in VRAM, saved state in the box's RAM, model weights in an SSD cache next to the GPU. When one operation's output feeds the next, don't ship a fat tensor to the laptop just to send it back — the client references it through a logical identifier. The SSD path covers weights today; arbitrary results are named an open research task. Honest scope.
The question isn't "can Wi-Fi carry PCIe's bytes?" — it's "what fraction of the exchange can be skipped entirely?" Cache immutable answers. Send independent commands asynchronously. Cut spurious synchronisations. The boundary stays slow; the number of crossings is the engineering variable.
Optimisation has a conscience: real data dependencies must survive the reordering. Their own test protocol says the proof must include cold start, competing clients, state recovery and latency spikes — not one flattering demo run. A vendor publishing the exam questions deserves the index's respect.
| Our check, not theirs | What would count as proof |
|---|---|
| Compatibility | A named app, a named OS, a named mode (API / SDK / Driver). “Works” without those three words is marketing, not evidence. |
| Everydayness | What changes after the first launch, through a wall, with a second user attached. The demo is the first minute; the product is month one. |
| Correctness | Results and data separation preserved across memory reuse and reconnection. For the compliance line: can user context and authority control stay on the client while compute is delegated with the minimum necessary data? — our research question, not their advertised feature. |
Plate W3 — three modes, three confidence levels, one wire
CAPABILITY MAP STATUS: hypothesis / claim translation. Use the evidence label on each row before reading the adjective.
Plate O4 — the Edinburgh test fails by design; that's information
Plate K5 — their caveats are better than their marketing
Plate Y6 — filed with interest, promoted on shipments and third-party runs
You're building the shared-household-GPU thesis: several screens, one accelerator, zero admin theatre. Follow the Developer Preview, the NYC show outcomes, and the first owner reports — especially Driver mode and two-client contention.
You need it now (Q4 preview), offline (no network, no GPU), portable (stationary appliance), or proven (nothing independent ships yet). Your working Olares/Steam-Headless route already delivers the family scenario — don't pay $9,999 to re-buy what you own.
Does it help me do more, or give me more to maintain? WiCi's architecture says the right things: skip crossings, preserve dependencies, publish your own exam questions. If Driver mode matures, this is the first box that upgrades existing work instead of relocating it. Until then: the most honest unproven idea in the index.
CLOSING — BOUNDARY RULE №1 · PLATE F
The competition here is not between beautiful boxes. It's between
ways of making local compute available to a human: relocate the work,
relocate the screen, or — the WiCi bet — leave everything where it is and
make the boundary itself cheap to cross. Rarely. Logically. Honestly.
The index doesn't grade dreams. It files them, marks what's proven,
and waits for the wire to show its receipts. Crossings skipped,
dependencies kept — that's the whole religion.